Article

Young Children’s Early Deductive Reasoning in Number: A Dialogic and Linguistic Approach

Author

Carol Murphy

Information

pp. 5~25 / 2015 Vol.9 No.3

Abstract

In this paper I present an examination of three six year-old children’s interaction with a task intended toencourage reasoning and collaboration in number. A case is made for the importance of deductivereasoning in supporting inductive reasoning and for the potential of hypothetical deductive reasoning insupporting concept reification in early number. The children’s discourse is analysed using a frameworkbased on opinion/belief, plausibility and deductive reasoning schema in relation to the functional use ofactuality and modality linguistic terms. The analysis suggests that the children were able to transition todeductive reasoning and this was reflected in their discourse through a shift to modality, and that thisshift suggested a sense of authority by the children in validating their thinking.

Keywords

References

1. Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (1995). Geometry and proof. The Mathematics Teacher, 88(1), 48-54.
2. Byrnes, J., & Duff, M. (1989). Young children's comprehension of modal expressions. Cognitive Development, 4, 369-387.
3. de Freitas, E., & Zolkower, B. (2010). Discursive authority in the mathematics classroom: Developing teacher capacity to analyze interactions in terms of modality and modulation. Paper presented at the Mathematics Education and Society 6 Proceedings, Berlin, Germany.
4. Diezmann, C. M., Watters, J. J., & English, L. D. (2002). Teacher behaviours that influence young children's reasoning. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2 pp 289-296), Norwich, UK.
5. Dutilh Novaes, C. (2013). A dialogical account of deductive reasoning as a case study for how culture shapes cognition. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13, 459-482.
6. Epstein, R. L. (2011). Reasoning in science and mathematics: Essays on logic as the art of reasoning well Socorro, NM: Advanced Reasoning Forum.
7. Font, V., Godino, J., & Gallardo, J. (2013). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 97-124.
8. Forman, E. (1996). Learning mathematics as participation in classroom practice: Implications of sociocultural theory for educational reform. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 115-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses (Second ed.). London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
10. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
11. Harris, P. I. (2000). The work of the imagination. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1993). Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14. Hodges, W. (2013). Modality in mathematics. Logique et Analyse, 56(221), 5-23.
15. Johnson-Laird, P. (2008). Mental models and deductive reasoning. In J. Adler & I. Rips (Eds.), Reasoning: Studies of human inference and its foundations (pp. 206-222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lee, L., & Wheeler, D. (1987). Algebraic thinking in high school students: their conceptions of generalisation and justification: Research report. Concordia University, Montreal.
17. Lee, L. N. Y., Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2008). The psychological puzzle of Sudoku. Thinking & Reasoning, 14, 342-364.
18. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its social and cultural foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Markovits, H. (2013). The development of abstract conditional reasoning. In P. Barrouillet & C. Gauffroy (Eds.), The development of thinking and reasoning. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20. Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 41-51.
21. McFeetors, P. J., & Mason, R. T. (2009). Learning deductive reasoning through games of logic. The Mathematics Teacher, 103, 284-290.
22. Morris, A. K. (2007). Factors affecting preservice teachers’ evaluation of the validity of students’ mathematical arguments in classroom contexts. Cognition & Instruction, 25, 479-522.
23. Papafragou, A., & Ozturk, O. (2007). Children’s acquisition of epistemic modality. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), Somerville, MA.
24. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
25. Radford, L. (2000). Signs and mearnings in students' emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 237-268.
26. Reid, D. A. (2002). Describing reasoning in early elementary school mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9, 234-237.
27. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2009). Series editor's foreword: The soul of mathematics. In D. A. Stylianou, M. L. Blanton, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective (pp. xii-xvi). New York, NY: Routledge.
28. Simon, M. A. (1996). Beyond inductive and deductive reasoning: The search for sense of self. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 197-210.
29. Steinbring, H. (2005). The construction of new mathematical knowledge in classroom interaction: an epistemological perspective. Berlin, NY: Springer.
30. Stylianidis, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 289-321.
31. Stylianou, D. A., & Blanton, M. L. (2011). Developing students' capacity for constructing proofs through discourse. Mathematics Teacher, 105, 140-145.
32. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi, India: Sage. van Oers, B. (2014). The roots of mathematising in young children's play. New York, NY: Springer.
33. Young-Loveridge, J. (2002). Early childhood and numeracy: Building an understanding of part-whole relationships. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(4), 36-42.