Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education

Article

Early Mathematical Learning: Number Processing Skills and Executive Function at 5 and 8 Years of Age

Author
Sonia L. J. White,Donna Berthelsen,Sue Walker,Kate E. Williams
Information
pp. 45~66 / 2015 Vol.9 No.3
e-ISSN2233-5234
p-ISSN1976-1961
Metrics Views 0 / Downloads 0
PDF

Abstract

This research investigated differences and associations in performance in number processing andexecutive function for children attending primary school in a large Australian metropolitan city. In across-sectional study, performance of 25 children in the first full-time year of school, (Prep; mean age =5.5 years) and 21 children in Year 3 (mean age = 8.5 years) completed three number processing tasksand three executive function tasks. Year 3 children consistently outperformed the Prep year children onmeasures of accuracy and reaction time, on the tasks of number comparison, calculation, shifting, andinhibition but not on number line estimation. The components of executive function (shifting, inhibition,and working memory) showed different patterns of correlation to performance on number processingtasks across the early years of school. Findings could be used to enhance teachers’ understanding aboutthe role of the cognitive processes employed by children in numeracy learning, and so inform teachers’classroom practices.

Keywords

mathematics number processing executive function early childhood education

References

  1. Arnold, D. H., & Doctoroff, G. L. (2003). The early education of socioeconomically disadvantaged children. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 517l Revidoi:10.1146/ annurev.psych.54.111301.145442
  2. Australian Council for Educational Research (2012). Monitoring Australian Year 4 student achievement internationally: TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Retrieved from http:// www.acer.edu.au/research/ns/iea-timss-2011-and-pirls/
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2012). The shape of the Australian curriculum (Version 4). Sydney: Author. Retrieved from www.acara.edu.au
  4. Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development, 81, 1641–1660. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x [Crossref]
  5. Blair, C. (2006). How similar are fluid cognition and general intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 109-160. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x060009034 [Crossref]
  6. Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647-663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x [Crossref]
  7. Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Educational Psychology Papers and Publications. Paper 76. doi: 10.10808/87565640801982312. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl. edu/edpsychpapers/76 [Crossref]
  8. Bull, R., Espy, K. A., Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T. D., & Nelson, J. M. (2011). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: Sources of variation in emergent mathematic achievement. Developmental Science, 14, 679–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01012.x [Crossref]
  9. Caro, D. H., McDonald, T., & Willms, J. D. (2009). Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence, Canadian Journal of Education, 32, 558-590.
  10. Clark, C. A., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1176- 1191. doi: 10.1037/a0019672 [Crossref]
  11. E-Prime [Computer software]. Sharpsburg, PA: Psychology Software Tools. Retrieved from http:/www.ptsnet.com
  12. Feigenson, L., Libertus, M. E., & Halberda, J. (2013). Links between the intuitive sense of number and formal mathematics ability. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 74-79. doi:10.1111/cdep.12019 [Crossref]
  13. Forget-Dubois, N., Lemelin, J., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Seguin, J., Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. (2007). Predicting early school achievement with the EDI: A longitudinal populationbased study. Early Education and Development, 18, 405-426. doi: 10.1080/ 10409280701610796
  14. Geary, D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 23-27. doi:10.1177/0963721412469398 [Crossref]
  15. Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., Littlefield, A., Wood, P., Hoard, M. K., & Nugent, L. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory analysis. Cognitive Development, 24, 411-429. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.001 [Crossref]
  16. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 121-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.002 [Crossref]
  17. Gelman, R, (2000). The epigenesis of mathematical thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 27–37. doi: 10.1016/s0193-3973(99)00048-9 [Crossref]
  18. Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). Test of early mathematics ability (3rd ed.). Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
  19. Gutman, L. M., Sameroff, A. J., & Cole, R, (2003). Academic trajectories from first to twelfth grades: Growth curves according to multiple risk and early child factors. Developmental Psychology, 39, 777-790. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.777 [Crossref]
  20. Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465. doi: 10.1037/a0012682 [Crossref]
  21. Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in nonverbal number acuity predict maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665-668. doi:10.1038/ nature07246
  22. International Association for the Evaluation of Education Achievement (2012). The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/index.html [ETC]
  23. Jordan, J. A., Mulhern, G., & Wylie, J. (2009). Individual differences in trajectories of arithmetical development in typically achieving 5- to 7-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 455-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.011 [Crossref]
  24. Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 60-68. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.46 [Crossref]
  25. Kolkman, M. E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Leseman, P. M. (2013). Early numerical development and the role of non-symbolic and symbolic skills. Learning and Instruction, 25, 95-103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.12.001 [Crossref]
  26. Lee, K., Ng, S. F., Pe, M. L., Ang, S. Y., Hasshim, M. N. A. M., & Bull, R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of emerging mathematical skills: Executive functioning, patterns, numeracy, and arithmetic. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 82- 99. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02016.x [Crossref]
  27. McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., & Morrison, F. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 471-490. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.003 [Crossref]
  28. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerta, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unit and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 [Crossref]
  29. Panamath [Computer software]. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University. Retrieved from http://panamath.org/ [ETC]
  30. Ponitz, C., McClelland, M., Matthews, J., Morrison, F., & García Coll, C. (2009). A structured observation of behavioral self-regulation and its contribution to kindergarten outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 605-619. doi: 10.1037/a0015365 [Crossref]
  31. Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in lowincome children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79, 375-394.
  32. Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S., (2011). Reducing the gap in numerical knowledge between low- and middle-income preschoolers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 32, 146–159. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.005 [Crossref]
  33. Swanson, H.L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A preliminary meta-analysis of the published literature on cognitive processes. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Applications of Research Methodology, Volume 1 - Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities (pp. 285-314). Bristol, UK: Elsevier.
  34. Szucs, D., & Goswami, U. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia: Fresh perspectives. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.004 [Crossref]
  35. Van der Sluis, S., De Jong, P. F., & Van der Leij, A. (2007). Executive functioning in children, and its relations with reasoning, reading, and arithmetic. Intelligence, 35, 427-449. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.001 [Crossref]
  36. Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2012). The development of executive functions and early mathematics: A dynamic relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 100-119. doi:10.1111/j.2044- 8279.2011.02035.x [Crossref]
  37. White, S., & Szucs, D. (2012). Representational change and strategy use in children's number line estimation during the first years of primary school. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 112. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-1. Retrieved from http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions. com/content/8/1/1. [Crossref]
  38. Wright, I., Waterman, M., Prescott, H., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2003). A new Stroop-like measure of inhibitory function development: typical developmental trends. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 561-575. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00145 [Crossref]