Article

A Cultural-Historical View of Child Development: Key Concepts for Going Beyond a Universal View of the Child

Author

Marilyn Fleer

Information

pp. 19~37 / 2015 Vol.9 No.1

Abstract

A developmental view of child development with its biological imperatives has been extensively critiqued over the years and found to be wanting from a range of cultural (Rogoff, 2003; Howes, 2010), social (Qvortrup, Corsaro & Honig, 2009) and even health (Bendelow, 2009; Rogoff, 2011) reasons. But what has been missing from these debates has been a theoretically robust presentation of another way of conceptualizing children’s development (Hedegaard & Fleer, 2013). In drawing upon cultural-historical theory, this paper argues for a more localised and nuanced conception of human development. Through analyzing how society creates the conditions for children’s development (Hedegaard, 2012), this paper presents a view of development that captures both a traditional (historical lived in the present moment) and contemporary (new cultural technologies) view of children’s lived experiences.

Keywords

References

1. Bendelow, G. (2009). Health, emotion and the body. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2. Bozhovich, L. I. (2009). The social situation of child development. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47, 59-86.
3. Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood program (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
4. Cheng, D. P-W., & Wu, S-C. (2013). Serious learners or serious playters? Revsitng the concept of leanring through play in Hong Kong and German Classroms. In O. F. Lillemyr, S. Dockett, and B. Perry (Eds.), Varied perspectvs on play and leanring. Theory and research on early years education (pp.193-212). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
5. Elkonin, D. B. (1999). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of children. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 37(6), 11-30.
6. Farquhar, S. & Fleer, M. (2007). Developmental colonisation of early childhood education in Aotearoa/New Zealand and Australia, In L. Keesing-Styles & H. Hedges (Eds.), Theorising early childhood practice. (pp.27-50), Merging dialogues, Pademelon Press: New South Wales, Australia.
7. Fleer, M. (2014). The demands and motives afforded through digital play in early childhood activity settings, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, (Special themed issue) 10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.012, p 1-8. [Crossref]
8. Grieshaber, S. (2004). Rethinking parent and child conflict. New York: Routledge.
9. Hakkarainen, P. (2010). Cultural-historical methodology of the study of human development in transitions. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 75-81.
10. Hedegaard, M. (2002). Learning and child development: A cultural-historical study. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
11. Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 127-138.
12. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, Leaning and Children’s Development: Everyday life in families and transition to school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Howes, C. (2010). Culture and child development in early childood programs. Practices of quality education and care. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14. Grieshaber, S., & McArdle, F. (2010). The trouble with play. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
15. Leontiev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Ministry of Education, (2012), Nurturing early learning. A curriculum framework for Kindergarten in Singapore. Republic of Singapore. Singapore.
17. National Association for the Education of Young Children, (2012). A joint position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children and the Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media at Saint Vincent College. www.naeyc.org/content/technology-and-young-children), Accessed 12.9.14
18. Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds. Experience, meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W. A., & Honig, M-S. (Eds.). (2009). The Palgrave Handbook of childhood studies. London, UK: Palgrave McMillan.
20. Rao, N., & Li, H. (2009). “Eduplay”: Beliefs and practices related to play and leanring in chinese Kindergartens. In I. Pramling & M. Fleer (Eds.), Play and learning in early childhood settings. International perspectives (pp.97-116). The Netherlands: Springer.
21. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive developoment in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Rogoff, B. (2011). Developing destinies. A Mayan midwife and town. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (Eds.). (2010). Early childhood matters. Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Veresov, N. (2006). Leading activity in developmental psychology. Concept and principle, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 44(5), 7-25.
26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosy psikhologii, 12(6), 62-76.
27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Problems of general psychology (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.
28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp.338-350). Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Child psychology. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 5. New York: Plenum.
30. Wood, E. (2010). Reconceptualizing the play-pedagogy relationship: From control to complexity. In L. Brooker and S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play (pp.11-24). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.